TINGKAT ETIKA AKADEMIK SISWA SMA DI ERA DIGITAL
Keywords:
Academic Procrastination, Cheating Behavior, Artificial Intelligence, Academic IntegrityAbstract
The development of digital technology has provided various benefits for learning activities but has also created challenges related to students' academic ethics. This study aimed to determine the level of academic ethics among senior high school students in the digital era. A descriptive quantitative method was employed using a Likert-scale questionnaire consisting of 25 statements. The respondents were 57 senior high school students. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics through score and percentage calculations. The results show that students' academic ethics are at a high level. A total of 53 students (92.98%) are classified in the high category and 4 students (7.02%) in the moderate category. The average academic ethics score is 107.09 out of a maximum score of 125. These findings indicate that most students have demonstrated good academic ethics in learning activities and the use of digital technology.
Keywords: academic ethics, high school students, digital era, digital literacy, academic integrity
Downloads
References
Adams, C., Pente, P., Lemermeyer, G., & Rockwell, G. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in K–12 education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(4), 1–28.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hendry, D., & Sumartiningsih. (2026). Etika dan penggunaan generative artificial intelligence oleh siswa sekolah menengah: Tinjauan literatur sistematis. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 11(1), 45–62.
Herlinawati, Firdaun, M., & Nasrah, D. (2025). Implementasi pedoman etika akademik digital dalam meningkatkan disiplin belajar siswa sekolah menengah. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 12(1), 78–95.
Lee, V. R., Pope, D., Miles, S., & Zárate, R. C. (2024). Cheating in the age of generative AI: A high school survey study of cheating behaviors before and after the release of ChatGPT. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100–118.
Literasi digital sebagai determinan etika komunikasi siswa SMA dalam menghadapi cyberbullying di media sosial. (2026). Jurnal Komunikasi dan Pendidikan Digital, 5(2), 112–130.
Literasi digital untuk meningkatkan etika berdigital bagi siswa siswi SMA Negeri 13 Kota Jambi. (2024). Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(4), 201–215.
Meningkatkan literasi digital siswa SMA melalui pelatihan digital skill dan etika digital. (2025). Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 14(3), 145–162.
Penerapan literasi digital dan etika bermedia sosial bagi siswa SMA di Era Society 5.0. (2025). Jurnal Komunikasi dan Pendidikan, 9(1), 78–92.
Penguatan literasi digital melalui edukasi pemanfaatan artificial intelligence secara etis bagi siswa SMA. (2025). Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 8(2), 55–73.
Penyuluhan etika ilmu dan literasi digital untuk siswa SMA. (2025). Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 6(1), 33–48.
Profil keterampilan literasi digital siswa SMA di era teknologi digital. (2024). Jurnal Literasi Digital, 8(3), 201–215.
Sharples, M. (2023). Towards social generative AI for education: Theory, practices and ethics. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 159–176.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing.
